The Fabian Game

As modern as of today, there are many among the internet who believe that the elite are diabolically moving towards global domination. That the citizens of the world, who are just plebs are being manipulated in to an ideology that their own convictions and thoughts are their own. Many of you are thinking how can that be? as you give a quick smirk to the idea. Many philosophers and psychologist determine that our own thoughts are not your own thoughts at all. Those thoughts are just brief bits and parts of other people thoughts. Lets look quickly how this can be. At birth the mind is a blank slate where the mind which is a biological super computer that can input and output information in billionths of seconds. As the information is taken in by our 5 senses the brain processes those thought based upon the knowledge we have stored in long term memory. When thoughts or other stimuli are inputted from the external environment, the long term memory then connects those ideas that the individual believes to be true or he/she or he/she can dismiss it as false. Yet as the individual becomes older, the individual’s cognitive thought process becomes much broader and complex. The individual is able to connect and tie his/her own cognitive dissonance or cognitive consonance which is derived from previous knowledge to what she/he has learned from other individuals, society and from other institutions which they affiliate themselves with. Derived from these thought processes the individual is able to identify themselves as something they can connect to such as political, social or economical identities. Engaging in these cliques the reinforcement becomes stronger and powerful where at some point the individuals thoughts become rooted within the individual. This is why in my own thoughts that if individuals were to separate from these cliques of society you would see a complex system that is interwoven within society. Through reasoning, as these higher levels of cliques which is part of society, each and every part is continuously in conflict with each other which cause confrontations. Just look at the political, religious and economical cliques, Autonomy vs. Tyranny, Liberals vs. Conservatives, Atheists vs. God, Anti Capitalists Vs Capitalists, and Supply Side Economics vs. Progressives. Each and every group arises to the occasion of revolution in some form or another which these ideas and thoughts breeds its own revolution within. If these confrontations were to be taken to the extremes, if one side was to become to powerful, armed conflict would result yet how would one side defeat the other side to gain power with out cognitive dissonance from society and to accept the change that is imposed upon society? As to reference to H.G. Wells book, “The New World Order” Published in 1939. H.G. Wells wrote that sovereign nations would end thus resulting, that free individuals will hate the new world order and will die protesting against it.

As far back as it was documented, moles within their own political affiliation of government were in training to be in particular roles for other foreign governments. Their roll was to obtain and achieve high level secretive levels within government to obtain classify information to benefit other political powers within the world. Yet what if the opposite was true? Those who are affiliated not with any political or other institutions but individuals who exist in a well-contrived system whose position is within the realms of despotic power where they use despotic ideology to tumble many institutions to create what is called, Problem – Reaction – Solution. Thus misplaces government to create other institutions and departments beyond the sovereignty of Congress and beyond the jurisdiction of the Courts.

What is Marriage?

There are many who say that this nation was founded upon Christian values. Yet if an individual were to take a closer look at the interwoven principles within the constitution I would mostly agree to say yes there are Judeo/Christian concepts and there are many parts of the constitution I would clarify to say no. Yet the interpretation U.S. Constitution can be applied to what are the rights and privileges that are granted to the individual to peruse life, liberty and happiness. As society gradually advances in the future years which many can identify to what their own existence is defined to be. They themselves whom are part of society become more complex. Yet in the mixture of society which the individual lives in live in the realms of the norm which majority takes part of and defines what is to be. That is to live in the micro world of the institutions that many people live in and expected to live in according the norm of the majority. In the micro world within in these complex systems become more defined and the autonomy of an individual takes over their own existence. We can say the rebellious side emerges which the individual that is restricted from the majority of the norm. At some points within many individuals, the individual would want to break away from the tyranny which only set of rules only applies to the majority of the norm. One such application to the majority norm is the issue of marriage which many concerned citizens try to justify that there is only one definition to the true meaning of marriage rather then to think what is marriage?

If one were to look within the document, one would notice that the U.S. Constitution does not state nor does it define what marriage is because marriage is a religious institution where by the US Constitution does not neither grant states nor the Federal government to create laws that favor religion. As it is does not interfere, make inferences or abridge with the freedom of religion. Clearly at this point that marriage is the concept of a religious virtue that is held in the most of respects. Yet what is the concept of As part of a religious institution they stand behind their dogma that has transition into modern days which religious dogma which is not a political entity but a body of doctrine concerning faith or morals formally which was stated and authoritatively proclaimed by a church for over 10,000 years. The question is what is a church? Many conceieve it as a physical stone/wooden structure but not so, the church are many who are the physical body.

If we

As to Marriage, marriage was and still well known that marriage union agreement of property. Property in the sense of a fathers daughter which is considered to be his property in exchange for which was

People are not bounded by religious institutions where as many are bounded by religoeus institutions yet there is a division among the two who disagree.

A letter from Senator Charles E. Schumer: Issue BioFuels

Last September I wrote a letter to Senator Charles E. Schumer about research projects based on the production of corn ethanol which is actually more of a pollutant then "Environmentally Friendly" when manufactured in to a bio fuel. Another part of my letter explained that there would a limited amount of production yield to manufacturing of corn ethanol and thus it will endanger American farmers and the economy as a whole in future prices and limited amount of corn nation wide and internationaly. This was the response I received that was sent to me which I agree with.


Dear Mr. Guerra:

Thank you for your letter regarding corn ethanol production. I share your concerns about the potential negative effects of this technology, and I am working to protect our environment and economy from any potential damage that it might cause.

Ethanol made from corn has been sold to the public as a panacea – as a “green” source of energy, and one that will secure America’s future by finally making us “energy independent.” Unfortunately, the rosy picture painted of corn ethanol by Midwestern corn conglomerates is not accurate. Rather than being environmentally friendly, the production of corn ethanol releases as much carbon into the atmosphere as traditional petroleum fuels. Furthermore, corn production introduces pesticides and fertilizers into the environment. And far from promoting energy independence, the shipping and manufacturing of corn ethanol requires as much petroleum as it takes to make the ethanol itself. Finally, our rush to produce ethanol has diverted corn away from other important uses. Short supplies of corn have put a huge strain on farmers, who are watching the cost of animal feed skyrocket. America’s demand for corn is raising the specter of food shortages throughout the poorer regions of Mexico and Central and South America. The unfortunate truth is that corn ethanol provides no environmental, economic, or security benefit over petroleum, and it raises serious ethical concerns about our obligations towards our neighbors.

But while corn ethanol is not the miracle fuel that we were promised, other plant-based “biofuels” do have the potential to protect the environment and reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil, without putting strains on American agriculture or other countries’ food supplies. Technology to produce ethanol from cellulosic plant fibers in non-food plants, such as switch grass or trees, is being developed. I am proud that New York is home to several of the most advanced cellulosic-ethanol companies, and I am working to bring federal research grants to these companies and the New York universities with which they work to increase the pace at which they develop the technology that all America needs. I voted for H.R. 6, the Renewable Fuels, Consumer Protection, and Energy Efficiency Act of 2007. This bill establishes a grant program within the Department of Energy to research cellulosic ethanol and other advanced biofuels.

I am excited at the possibility of fuel made from plants, and I look forward to a day when biofuels make up a significant part of America’s energy stock. The faster that we are able to develop cellulosic ethanol and other truly “green” fuels, the sooner we can abandon corn ethanol and return corn production to its best use: food.

Thank you for taking the time to contact me on this important issue. I hope that you will contact me again if there is ever anything that I can do for you on this or any other issue.



Sincerely,

Charles E. Schumer
United States Senator

Please do not respond to this email. To send another message please visit my website at http://schumer.senate.gov/SchumerWebsite/contact/webform.cfm . Thank you.

The Destinctsion Between Life and Alive

People often think and write that life begins at the moment of conception which is the case but it is the beginning to begin life which the cells begin to form in proper sequence. Starting from a zygote which then transforms in to a 2 cell stage, then a 4 cell stage which then developes to a cell mass call the morula. Once in this developmental stage a cavity is then formed which the cell is a now a circumfrance called the blastula. After this stage is complete the next stage is the gastrula which is form is in a shape of a horse shoe. As the cells developes more of a complex infrastructure (nerves, lungs, hear, brain, ect.) is formed to sustain life after birth. This is the most important and essential developmental stage for every organism to continue to exist in its external environnment. Yet there is a distinctive definition between what life is and what is alive.

We know by definition that life is the creation of existance. Enable to exist our complex system must sustain our living body to continue to live. In other words to be alive all organs within the organism must sustain your own existance. To sustain your existance to be alive all organs must be healthy to survive inside the womb. Enable for healthy organs to flourish, a supply of nutriants are needed to be to be digested and distributed among the many individual cells of the body. Once the nutrients are utilized by the cells, the cells ejects the excess waste and disposes of it eaither by urination or by the fecese. If both are not disposed of by the body, the organism dies.

Within the womb, the mother is the life support for the fetus that supplies the nutrients and ejects the the wastes. Enable for the fetus to survive during the 9months of pregancy. This supply line the umbilacle cord must supply the nutrients towards the fetus and ejects the waste away from the fetus. Therefore if this was not so the fetus will not have an independent existance if sperated from the mother and therefore ceases to live. Yet the fetus continues an independent existance in many respects to it's own functioning organs.

Within its own environment, internaly. Biofactors are needed to form a relationship between mother and her fetus for its own suvival. These biofactors hold true and cannot be denyed to the truth that all living things must coexist with the natrual environment, permantly or temporarly to survive. Where as the case for the natrual environment for the fetus that a coexitance does exist within the temporary environment which is it's own biome. A biome of abiotic conditions that would incluse the emmion sac fluid. Emnionitic fluid to provide cusion and moisture for the fetus. The bio factors are just as important to the effects towards the devlopment of a homosapian. Yet bio factors are nothig more then the relationship between two organiims which biotic and abiotic exist together to develope and to deliver a homosapian to it's external world which it will live in. This relationship represents a symbiosis, a symbolic relationship that is natrrually positive between the mohter and the fetus. This relationship can be reasoned through to two basic prinicples. Since biofactors are conditions that follow naatrual biological laws, these basic laws follows and confirms to the term that there is a symbiosis relationship. According to the first principle notes that all living things depend on their ability to carry out basic life functions. As mentioned before tgar the life process are carried out theough the complex systems enable to keep the organism alive. The second priniple notes that since there is a direct symbiotic relationship , there existance must be mutual in repespect to tcreate and to sustain life for the organim. Yey enable to be mutually positive for the mother, mutualism can be focused on the various psych of mind regarding to the spiritual, political and religous aspect of thought.