Our Exit from Iraq.

Since the war began in Iraq in 2004 that still continues today. The Iraq war has mounted too many battles that began to rage in Fallujah, Bagdad and pockets of resistance. As a result from these battles there has been an onslaught among the US Troops which many of them fought with dignity, honor and courage. Yet as our servicemen had fallen or have been wounded in action many of its citizens in the US had seen the broadcasts and images that have been implanted and branded within their minds forever. Such images among the many had started to wonder and doubt like the many who thought the war was lost and there was no end to the war. Especially among the Liberals who automatically claimed that the war was lost and we were defeated on the battle field. Yet they had no faith in the ideas and cause for such actions which they themselves had no ideas or plans of action because of their own political ideology which does not fit the norm.

Unlike conservatives Liberals seem to view national security as the means for social work which they place their political ideology in the hands of the United Nations as to intervening and intervention for peace, determining our National Security and International Law. As for the United Nations I do not know one successful peace keeping mission that the United Nations has provide for the world? Was it at Panama, Central America, Berruit, Granada, Bosnia, or was it Somalia? Last time history have been checked it was the United States that got involved with those military operations while the UN Diplomats continued to say they disagree with genocide and military aggression. Where was United Nations to implement the International Criminal Court proceedings to indite Communist leaders who slaughtered a million and half Asian peasants or Saddam Heusan had ordered over 300,000 of his own people to be killed. It can only be in conclusion that the UN Diplomats and its country leaders are only after their self interest. If the UN was serious about peace, peace would have been achieved through this diplomatic tool. Yet when looking at the factors for National Security within our own boarders and the security of our National Interests it is only thought through the combined strength of the United States agencies and Military can successfully achieve and to accomplish true goals. Numerous factors as to taking chances to assert or to dispose of something for example when Saddam Huesien was n the process of building his atomic reactor it was not UN Resolutions and International Law that forced him to dismantle the reactor. It was Ronald Reagan who ordered it to be a target to be destroyed. It was not International Law that brought Kaddafi the known terrorist to mend his ways it took a bomb that destroyed his house, yet Kaddafi handed over and disposed of the many biological weapons that he had disposed in Libya. As a nation if we were to allow such ideas of "International Laws" to exist with United States National Security the world would be waiting a long time for peace which allows as a safe haven for dictators even terrorists to take advantage of political situations that would achieve their own self interest. It is a policy of weakness in thought, being taking advantage of because of gullibility, ineptitude contempt of our national defense and enacting laws that abide terrorists and gang activity. Such Law was enacted, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978 which was sponsored by Ted Kennedy and other Liberal Democrats. FISA prevents the executive branch from monorting foreign enemies and which the executive office must convince a special court that there are sufficient specific and articuale facts to indicate that the individual’s activities are in preparation for sabotage or international terrorism. In other words there is a veritable wall that prevents the security of our Nation. Such acts from Liberals who “we the people” elect to the congress, you put your trust in them to make moral and intelligent decisions yet they are jeopardizing the National Security of this nation and National interests.

As Iraq’s security becomes a metamorphosis that is taking shape where there was once a chaotic ethno sectarian violence, AQI’s errors, the surge in U.S. troop levels and the capacity of the ISF. With these numerous combinations that took place since 2006 the over all violence has declined by 80% since the surge in U.S. troop levels was strategically implemented. The Acts of the ethno sectarian civil war which actually did occur declined 90% because of AQI’s errors and the shifting of becoming aware of their own self awareness in political freedoms. There is an Invisible Hand at hand that guided Sunnis and Shiites to becoming in part of the Iraqi government. Through strategies and plans and with out International Laws or UN resolutions we can clearly see that political freedom guides their own initiative and drive towards their own peace and peace to its country. This can be justifiable in an example that disrupting and boycotting elections which the Sunnis did in the 2005 elections. The boycott and disrupting the elections caused the Shiite militia to take control over various governments of various provinces. Since then there is an anormance support and the majority of the Iraqi people who reject the militia which is also in decline are now viewing that socially and cultural differences within the both parties were in the wrong and how the parties hindered the political process.

As the presence of U.S. and the coalition stayed persevering on a route towards a stable and political government. I agree that the Iraq is long is hard but the hard work that was put in to it seems to have created a new Iraq that the Iraqi people can be proud of and with out the fear of living in fear. If the attitudes were to preserver by Senator Harry Reid (D, AZ) who had said in 2007 that the war was lost yet Senator Harry Reid (D, AZ) was not up to par with Foreign Affairs and the current events occurring in Iraq. As of today, September 1, 2008 Al Anbar one of the largest province in Iraq has been handed over to the Iraqi people which Al Qaida thought it was safe haven for them to terrorize and control the province. In addition to the political changes The Iraqi military has grown significantly and as of 2008 it is estimated that has grown to 559,000. It is estimated that new solders and police will increase to 100,000 per year. As of 2008 in to 2009 the readiness of solders and police is estimated at 55% meaning that as new solders and policemen are recruited and trained there can be a large rotation military and police to be taken out off the battle field and to meet the new demands and training that is needed to sustain Iraq’s national security, security of the state and it’s citizens. As these security forces are in full swing it is likely that who ever is president or in congress it is possible for the military to be withdrawn but only as a percentage based upon the percentages of combat ready of the Iraqi solders and police.

As the country is still fragile it is essential that the U.S. and coalition forces are a necessity in the presence of Iraq. Why? There are numerous reasons to why because there are still influential minds within politicians who are still loyalists to religion and can be easily persuaded by other typical Arab States. Thus fall to prey from other Arab nations who are not concerned about establishing elections and the freedom of individuals. As a result there could be coup attempts that can emerge and if a coup attempts fail, there can be an out break of a war between the sectarian’s and its rivals. If we were to withdraw our troops now as of today, foreign policy experts and the CFR claim a military coup can occur. Also another danger would be organized crime and the political leaders of Iraq, the stronger ISF would lead to many misfortunes. Between the two combinations including the wealth of Iraq Oil, there are numerous scenarios that it could lead to a most hostile and dangerous situation, not only to the Iraq people but to other nations.
As of today there is a true chance that a withdraw can be possible according to security of Iraq and that